REALWorld Law

Construction

Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure (ADR)

Is it common for construction disputes to be referred to ADR – such as adjudication, determination by an expert, mediation or conciliation? Is a form of ADR required by law, perhaps as a mandatory first step in the dispute resolution procedure?

Romania

Romania

The most common forms of ADR are: mediation, conciliation and determination by an expert. There is not a great deal of information available in the market regarding the use of ADR in construction disputes.

Mediation

Mediation is a non-binding form of dispute resolution that works well for minor disputes. The mediator engages in shuttle diplomacy to formulate a solution that is acceptable to both sides. It has one major disadvantage. If the mediator fails to find common ground, the dispute moves back to the litigation track. As a result, it works well for minor disputes. It does not work very well with difficult disputes or unreasonable parties.

Conciliation

Conciliation is another dispute resolution process that involves building a positive relationship between the parties of dispute. The “conciliator” is an impartial person that assists the parties by driving their negotiations and directing them towards a satisfactory agreement. Conciliation is a much less adversarial proceeding seeking to identify an obligation that has been breached and searching to find the optimal solution.

Determination by an expert

Determination by an expert is a procedure in which a dispute or a difference between the parties is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one expert who make a determination on the matter referred to it. The determination is not binding, unless the parties agree otherwise. It is a consensual and confidential procedure.