REALWorld Law

Commercial leases

Security of tenure

Does a tenant have a right to continue to occupy the relevant real estate after the expiry of a commercial lease?

United States

United States

Generally speaking, a tenant’s right to occupy the leased premises ends when the term of its lease expires. However, under the common law ‘holdover rule’, a tenant remaining in possession after lease expiration without the landlord’s agreement may be treated by the landlord either as a trespasser subject to eviction or as a tenant under a lease for a new term, which term is generally equal to the rent payment periods set forth in the lease. For example, if rent is paid monthly, the new term cwould be month to month and subject to 30 days’ notice by either party to terminate. Most states have enacted legislation abolishing this rule – the terms of those statutes vary widely in how they govern the relationship between the landlord and the holdover tenant. Consequently, guidance with respect to the actions to be taken by a landlord to ensure timely vacation of the premises should be sought from a qualified local lawyer. That said, a well-drafted lease will typically clearly state how a holdover situation will be handled; for example, it may give the landlord broad rights to immediately evict the holdover tenant while charging the holdover tenant a much higher rate of rent during the period of holdover. It is fairly typical to see landlords and tenants agree in their commercial leases to holdover rent at a rate of 150% –-- 200% of the immediately preceding rent during the period of holdover. Another variation could be for a lower amount (such as 125%) for a limited period, such as 30 days, followed by an escalation to a higher amount such as the aforementioned 150% –-- 200%. However, landlords should be careful not to charge too high a rate, as it could constitute an unenforceable ‘penalty’. U.S. law typically disfavours penalties in contracts, and the more a holdover rental escalation strays from the foregoing 200% increase, the more likely it could be successfully struck down by a tenant as an unenforceable ‘penalty’.